Sexual tension

Image
Edward Hadas
Last Updated : Jan 24 2013 | 2:10 AM IST

No one should doubt that Viviane Reding has good intentions. The EU’s justice commissioner believes that she is righting a wrong with her plan to require European companies above a modest size to reserve at least 40 percent of the non-executive board positions for women. But the idea is wrongheaded.

Lesser numerical inequality would be a worthy goal if the current gender imbalance on corporate boards was mainly caused by gender-based discrimination. That is possible but far from certain. Even if there is some residual anti-woman prejudice, the actual paucity of women on boards may well largely reflect actually differences between the sexes.

Sexual metaphysics are not required to see that quotas could end up increasing prejudice. Every woman board member would be under a cloud of doubt about her competence. Every man put aside for a woman suspected of not being able to make the grade otherwise will be embittered. In due course, women will crush any glass ceiling on board membership; but on their own, as they have already in so many domains.

Perhaps the most alarming aspect of this proposal is its bossiness. Reding seems to think that the government can use any means, however crude, to fight whatever it decides is injustice. That logic leads directly to more quotas, perhaps in favour of ethnic or sexual minorities, or any group judged to be disadvantaged. And why not consider negative quotas, against the groups which the government one day decides have an unfair advantage: why not fight the over-representation of Oxford graduates, or that of people who had pushy parents?

Still, there is a silver lining to this bad plan. Reding didn’t propose a gender quota for executive directors, let alone executives. Even she probably realises that such discrimination would make companies less effective. But non-executive members of boards - whatever their gender, age and background - routinely fail to spot trouble and rarely provide valuable guidance. So if quota-promoted women do worse than men, no one will be able to tell.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 06 2012 | 12:42 AM IST

Next Story