James Bond: Dr No has finally stopped James Bond. Producers behind the British spy movie series have put the next film on hold because of financial woes at the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer studio. Presciently, the villain in the 2006 update of “Casino Royale” was a rogue trader who shed tears of blood; maybe the franchise can capitalize further on anti-Wall Street sentiment for the delayed 23rd installment in the series.
MGM’s troubles stem from a 2005 leveraged buyout that saddled it with too much debt. Its private equity owners - including TPG and Providence Equity Partners - have had the studio on the block since November. The uncertainty has led EON Productions to postpone the next 007 film indefinitely.
The delay may yet turn out useful. The fallout from the financial crisis could provide myriad story ideas. A short-selling villain has been done, but how about a private equity titan leveraging systemically important companies to the hilt and holding creditors to ransom? Convincing details could be taken from MGM’s own experience.
Or what about a sinister banker building a huge but flimsy pyramid of debt and then demanding hundreds of billions of dollars from governments around the world to avert economic collapse? It might be tempting to cast a caricature of Goldman Sachs boss Lloyd Blankfein. But an option with better shock value could be to pick a smiling baddie more reminiscent of JPMorgan Chief Executive Jamie Dimon, about the only banker around today who it seems can’t put a foot wrong.
A new Bond film might draw from the credit crunch in other ways too. The pre-crisis difficulties of US carmakers saw Bond’s favored and originally very English Aston Martin sold by Ford Motor in 2007 to a consortium led by Kuwaiti investors. The biggest of them, Investment Dar, ran into financial trouble of its own last year, becoming the first major company to default on an Islamic bond, or sukuk.
The traditional 007 formula mixed with globe-trotting financiers, the Middle East, money and power could prove irresistible to moviegoers. Once, that is, the production timepiece for “Bond 23” - made, naturally, by still Swiss-owned Omega starts ticking again.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
