T N Ninan: The discipline of global rules

We suffer from lack of accountability but new pressure points are being created by the fact of India becoming a more integrated part of the world economy and global systems.

Image
T N Ninan
Last Updated : Aug 27 2016 | 2:01 AM IST
If you want to be a part of a globalised world, you have to adopt global standards of conduct—or be shown up and bear a heavy cost. Indian companies may have a long history of getting away with making false claims about their products in domestic markets, because of lax regulatory standards and because there is no history of judges handing down exemplary punishment on behalf of consumers. 

But when you try the same trick as a part of a global supply chain, you can be shown up very badly—as seems to have happened with Welspun which stands accused by large American retail chains like Target and Wal-Mart of making false claims about the cotton used in textile products. Earlier, drug companies paid a similar price when they were shown to have falsified research data. 

One may succumb to temptation or pressure and fudge domestically, as the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) seems to have done while clearing a wrestler of doping charges. But this was in the run-up to the Rio Olympics, and NADA has been shown up very badly by the verdict of its global counterpart, which has made out a telling case against the wrestler, and left NADA stripped naked. Welspun’s value on the stock market has halved in less than a week, and NADA will take a long time to wear once again the cloak of credibility.

There are other examples. Our governments are easily prone to arbitrary decisions, and go unchallenged because citizens don’t feel they have the power to fight, or because businessmen would rather not cross the government and invite further trouble. But if you are dealing with international firms, such arbitrariness can turn back and bite you—as seems to have happened with the cancelled Antrix-Devas deal where international arbitration has left Antrix with a potential bill for damages of a few thousand crores of rupees. 

Our tax officials in particular have a terrible reputation for arbitrary decisions that hapless tax-payers fight through the labyrinthine court system for years; in a Kafkaesque system, they are often forced to pay up the tax demand before being allowed to appeal against it. But when tax officials try the same arbitrary gambit with international companies, all hell can break lose. In his election campaign, Narendra Modi had promised an end to what he called “tax terrorism”, and it is a welcome sign that both he and the finance minister have been pressing tax officials in recent weeks to improve their public image. But something more than exhortation is necessary; there has to be a change in the incentive-disincentive structure. A simple but effective solution would be to cut short the careers of tax officials whose orders are repeatedly overturned by appellate bodies and courts.

In recent years, civil society activists have emerged as a counter-point to arbitrary governments and erring companies. The work done by organizations like the Centre for Science and Environment on the special dangers of diesel pollution (finally bearing fruit, after nearly two decades), on dangerous additives or pollutants in food items, on pesticides and much else has made a difference, but there isn’t enough work being done that marries responsible activism with solid technological or economic facts and arguments. 

In any case the present government has started a misguided but systematic crackdown on non-government organizations, while the environment minister seems to have bought the bogus line that development must come first, and concern for environmental damage second (so how about polluting the Ganga with even more industrial effluents before we start cleaning the river?). In other words, there aren’t enough pressure points being created domestically for ensuring proper standards of conduct by the most powerful agents, ie governments and companies. So perhaps it is just as well that new pressure points are being created by the fact of India becoming a more integrated part of the world economy and global systems.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper

First Published: Aug 26 2016 | 10:50 PM IST

Next Story