Uncivil disobedience

Hong Kong shreds hopes for orderly disorder

Image
Robyn MakJohn Foley
Last Updated : Oct 02 2014 | 4:58 PM IST
Hong Kong's experiment in orderly disorder is coming unstuck. Thousands of protestors took to the streets on September 29 calling for political reform and universal suffrage, and many still remain a day later. Markets are open, and the financial sector hasn't taken any direct hits. But what started as a meticulously planned act of civil disobedience now risks spiralling into something more volatile and unpredictable, with damaging long term-implications for the city.

The "Occupy Central" movement has been in the works for over a year, but its beginning took all sides by surprise. Protests started three days ahead of schedule after students tried to break into government buildings. Riot police unleashed tear gas and pepper spray in the central business and government districts. The agenda has also taken an unexpected turn. Where organisers originally wanted deeper debate over political reforms for the 2017 elections, students and protest leaders are now calling for Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying to step down.

The lesson is that even in orderly societies, disquiet is hard to predict or contain. While the protest organisers' original plan was to target the financial sector, markets remained open on September 29. Many global financial companies reported business as usual. But rather than narrowly pinpointing finance, the sit-in is swelling into a social movement of people with little protest experience, spreading to at least two popular shopping districts. Fragmentation makes the unrest harder to control. Worryingly, thousands of people paid no heed to the organisers' calls to go home. The government's heavy-handed response may only prompt otherwise ambivalent people to join, especially when a two-day public holiday begins on October 1.

While things could deteriorate further, Hong Kong at its worst still looks more stable than many places in Asia. In mainland China, such protests would have been stamped far more harshly. But in such a dense and compact region, minor disruptions have a magnified effect. If nothing else, Occupy Central could challenge the notion that comfortable middle classes aren't interested in engaging in messy unrest. And investors in the city will have to price in a new layer of volatility.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 30 2014 | 9:32 PM IST

Next Story