While the bank apologised later, saying it wasn’t mandatory for customers to provide documentary evidence for large cash withdrawals and it was doing so to protect customers, this did not wash.
So, do banks in India have the right to stop you from withdrawing money from your account or seek documentary evidence or put a limit on withdrawals? While there are limits of Rs 10,000-20,000 on daily debit card withdrawals, most feel it is neither possible or fair to do so when the customer goes to a bank branch.
Says consumer lawyer Jehangir Gai, “This can lead to unnecessary problems.” As Gai points out, if a lump sum is required for hospitalisation and the bank wants documentary proof to release money, this could lead to serious repercussiond if the person dies and the bank would be liable for compensation.
Another executive at a leading public sector bank says a bank is merely a custodian of an individual’s money and under a contractual agreement to repay. Under the Reserve Bank’s MITC (Most Important Terms and Conditions) guidelines, banks are responsible for returning the amount with them (with necessary charges, if the account is being closed). Even in the case of fixed deposits, if there is a premature withdrawal, banks normally charge a penalty.
Yes, sometimes smaller co-operative banks might not have a very large amount handy. But, in such cases, the bank should tell customers they’d need a day’s notice for withdrawals above a certain amount, say Rs 5 lakh.
If faced with such a problem, one should first approach the bank’s internal grievance department and then the banking ombudsman. If the solution is not coming, approach the Union government’s department of financial services’ grievance redressal mechanism.
Ashvin Parekh, partner, Ernst and Young, makes an important observation: “To protect the interest of deposit holders, most markets worldwide now require banking companies to form subsidiary companies in those markets. The Reserve Bank of India has also issued guidelines with that objective. It is now important that all foreign banks, which are systemically important to the market, adopt these reforms. The regulator should also pursue their reforms, perhaps more rigorously.”
Forming a subsidiary would ensure the bank’s assets and liabilities are frozen in the country, thereby protecting Indian customers from any external shock.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)