HC stays Assembly Speaker's letter on Binny's AAP membership

The court issued notices to the Speaker of the House and Aam Aadmi Party on Binny's petition and listed the matter for further hearing on March 4

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 19 2014 | 7:57 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today stayed the Assembly Speaker's letter which said that MLA Vinod Kumar Binny continued to be a member of the Aam Aadmi Party despite his expulsion from it.

Justice Manmohan said the Supreme Court verdict, relying upon which the Speaker had said that Binny will have to tow the party line in any transaction of business on the floor of the House, will not be applicable on him.

"Letter dated February 11, 2014 of the Speaker of the Delhi Assembly is stayed till the next date of hearing and the G Vishwanathan judgement (relied upon by the Speaker) will not be applicable to the petitioner," the court said.

The court issued notices to the Speaker of the House and Aam Aadmi Party on Binny's petition and listed the matter for further hearing on March 4.

Justice Manmohan observed that as the question of law raised by Binny is seized of by the apex court, which has stayed the operation of the G Vishwanathan verdict in the case of Amar Singh and Jaya Prada, "this court is of the opinion that the petitioner's right (for a relief) should not be curtailed".

The apex court had in 2010 stayed the operation of its verdict to protect them from disqualification as MPs after they were expelled by the Samajwadi Party.

The apex court in the G Vishwanathan verdict had held that an expelled member continued to be part of the party which set him up as a candidate during elections.

During the proceedings, the high court said that while Binny has raised questions of law, it is bound by the apex court verdict which has not been stayed.

However, advocate Rahul Raj Malik, appearing for Binny, contended the legislator's case is similar to that of Amar Singh and Jaya Prada and thus, he should be treated at parity with them.

Agreeing with the contention, the high court in its interim order said that it is of the view "that petitioner's (Binny) case is on the same lines as that of Amar Singh and Jaya Prada".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 19 2014 | 7:42 PM IST

Next Story