How to impeach or not to impeach CJI Dipak Misra was the question

As the Budget session of Parliament was ending on April 6, several Opposition parties had second thoughts on moving an impeachment notice against CJI Dipak Misra

Justice Dipak Misra sworn in as 45th CJI, Kovind administers oath of office
Justice Dipak Misra takes oath as the Chief Justice of India (CJI). Photo: ANI
Archis Mohan New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 21 2018 | 8:06 AM IST
As the Budget session of Parliament was ending on April 6, several Opposition parties had second thoughts on moving an impeachment notice against Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra.

The Rajya Sabha members of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) withdrew their signatures on the draft impeachment notice. It meant the page with the signatures of the DMK MPs had to be removed, and other MPs who had signatures on that page had to put in theirs afresh.

The MPs of the Rashtriya Janata Dal and the Trinamool Congress refused to sign. The Biju Janata Dal, the ruling party in Odisha, has decided not to get involved in this. 

Chief Justice Misra hails from Odisha.

Even the Congress rethought its decision, while the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party too had misgivings.

Some lawyers in the Congress argued against upsetting the judiciary, but there was an equally strong effort led by Kapil Sibal and Ghulam Nabi Azad to go ahead with the process.

Interestingly, it was tongue lashing from Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) chief Sharad Pawar that spurred the Congress and other parties to go ahead with their move. In recent months, Pawar has emerged as the guiding light of Opposition unity against the Narendra Modi-led Bharatiya Janata Party.

Left leaders, particularly Communist Party of India (Marxist) General Secretary Sitaram Yechury, and the Congress’ Sibal and Azad had led the effort to convince Pawar and others. Yechury’s predecessor and rival, Prakash Karat, has opposed the move.

But once Pawar had been convinced and signed the impeachment motion along with his party's other Rajya Sabha MPs, he was livid with the Congress party for getting cold feet.


According to an Opposition Rajya Sabha MP, Pawar told the Congress leadership how most MPs had signed the draft impeachment notice at grave risk to their reputations and careers.

Pawar voiced the sentiments of several MPs. “Most of us represent smaller parties. Whatever the public perception, neither we nor our parties have the wherewithal to fight expensive court battles if cases were to be filed against us out of sheer vindictiveness for pursuing the impeachment motion,” an Opposition MP said.

This too was the reason why the DMK, Trinamool Congress, and some Congress MPs did not sign the impeachment notice.
The NCP chief asked the Congress leadership why their signatures, including those of the NCP MPs, were collected when it did not intend to pursue the impeachment motion to its logical conclusion.

All the NCP members, including Pawar, Praful Patel, Majeed Memon and Vandana Chavan, had signed the impeachment notice.

Most of the Congress leaders signed, with Azad being the first. Other prominent ones to sign were Sibal, AK Antony, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Ahmed Patel and Jairam Ramesh.

According to Congress leaders, former prime minister (PM) Manmohan Singh had not signed but supported the move. He argued it did not behave a former PM to disrespect the office of the Chief Justice of India. Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram did not sign. Sibal said: “We didn’t want a few others to be embarrassed as certain matters are pending."

The BSP’s Satish Chandra Mishra, a senior lawyer, signed as did the Samajwadi Party leader in the Rajya Sabha, Ram Gopal Yadav.
A week ago, Opposition leaders sought time from Rajya Sabha Chairman M Venkaiah Naidu’s office, and had to specify the purpose of their visit.

According to sources, opposition leaders were surprised to find the next day that the Chairman would be on a visit to Assam and other Northeastern states for the better part of the week.

On Thursday afternoon, the Chairman’s office confirmed a time for Opposition leaders to meet Naidu on Friday afternoon.

Earlier on Thursday, a Supreme Court Bench, headed by the CJI, dismissed petitions seeking a probe into the alleged mysterious death of special Central Bureau of Investigation judge BH Loya.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story