The next hearing on the petition in this regard is slated for the coming Thursday in the high court (HC) here. The interim stay on the Act’s implementation, granted by the HC in April 2015, continues. The community, which has already organised 21 protest marches in the state, has planned two massive protests, at Kolhapur on the coming Saturday and Thane on Sunday. And, a concluding march in Mumbai after Diwali.
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has reiterated his government’s commitment for the quota to Marathas, a third of the state's population. Community groups, such as the Maratha Kranti Morcha, want the announcement to be backed with action, including in the court.
Given the issue’s political importance, Fadnavis had a meeting with opposition parties 10 days earlier, to explain the government's strategy. He’d assured that a battery of leading lawyers would argue for the government's stance in the HC.
Senior minister Chandrakant Patil, who moved the Maratha reservation resolution at the party's state executive meeting last week, said the resolution made it clear that the 16 per cent quota would not be included within the one for Other Backward Classes. The government will urge the Supreme Court to consider allowing quotas in Maharashtra to exceed 51 per cent. The SC cap is 50 per cent in any state but is 69 per cent in Tamil Nadu, a point Patil noted.
Opposition parties use the fact to make their point. Former deputy chief minister Ajit Pawar at his party's rally in western Maharashtra on Sunday alleged the Fadnavis government lacked political will. ''If Tamil Nadu could do it, what has stopped Maharashtra?” he demanded.
A government official referred to the HC’s observation while giving an interim stay. It had said the SC has ruled that reservations states cannot exceed 50 per cent, except in extraordinary circumstances for which justification has to be made. Already, there is 52 per cent reservation in government jobs and educational institutions for various backward groups in the state. The previous Congress-NCP government had, ahead of the assembly election in October 2014, raised it to 73 per cent by announcing the 16 per cent quota for Marathas and five per cent for Muslims.
Further, the HC had observed that the Second Backward Classes Commission Report (Mandal report, 1990), National Commission for Backward Classes report of February 2000, and the report of the Maharashtra State Backward Classes Commission (Bapat report of July 2008) had held that the Maratha community could not be termed backward. In fact, the court had said, the reports concluded the Maratha community was a "socially advanced and prestigious community".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)