SC directs status quo in Karnataka MLA resigning case, next hearing July 16

Top court will decide on larger issue of constitutionality of the MLAs resigning and whether the speaker could be given directions by it

Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
Aashish Aryan New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Jul 12 2019 | 4:40 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Speaker and the 10 rebel Members of Legislative Assembly (MLA) belonging to the Congress Janta Dal (Secular) government in Karnataka to maintain status quo as of today with respect to their resignation. The top court will next hear the matter on July 16, when it will decide on the larger question of constitutionality of the MLAs resigning and whether the speaker could be given directions by the court.

The issue of maintainability of the rebel MLAs' petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was also raised by counsels for the state’s Chief Minister H D Kumaraswamy, and Speaker K R Ramesh Kumar.

A three-judge Bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said that Kumar would neither decide the issue of resignation of the MLAs nor that of their disqualification. This, the three judge Bench said, would enable the court to decide the larger issues raised by the respective parties during the hearing.

During the hearing on Thursday, the Supreme Court had allowed 10 rebel MLAs to meet the Speaker and convey to him their decision to resign. The 10 MLAs had to meet the Speaker by 6 PM and the latter had to take a decision by midnight. During the hearing on Friday, however, the court was told that the Speaker had not come to a decision yet as he had to verify the resignations of the MLAs.

The 10 rebel MLAs who have moved SC have alleged that the Assembly Speaker was not accepting their resignations. The MLAs of the Congress-Janata Dal (Secular), or JD(S) coalition, who have filed the petition, are Pratap Gouda Patil, Ramesh Jarkiholi, Byrati Basavaraj, B C Patil, S T Somashekhar, Arbail Shivaram Hebbar, Mahesh Kumathalli, K Gopalaiah, A H Vishwanath, and Narayana Gowda.

The 10 MLAs had also alleged on Thursday that when they initially went to meet the Speaker of the Assembly on July 6, he left his office through the backdoor to avoid meeting them. On Friday, however, the court was told that all the MLAs who had come to meet the speaker had on video accepted that the latter had never avoided meeting them and neither had he absconded from his house.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Supreme Court

Next Story