SC rejects plea seeking re-election over NOTA

The Election Commission introduced NOTA in the ongoing assembly elections to five states

IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 25 2013 | 7:39 PM IST

The Supreme Court Monday dismissed a petition seeking direction to the Election Commission to hold a re-poll in a constituency when 50 percent or more voters vote for 'NOTA' (None of the Above), rejecting all candidates.

Rejecting the PIL by Jagan Nath, Chief Justice P. Sathasivam, Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai and Justice Ranjan Gogoi said it was for parliament to amend the Representation of People Act for the election panel to take such a course.

"It is for parliament to amend the law. We can't interfere. If you want, you make a representation to the government," Chief Justice Sathasivam said.

The court also observed that it was too early to exercise such an option as NOTA had been introduced only recently and one has yet to see the response of the electorate.

The apex court had Sep 27 said that for a vibrant democracy, the voter has to have the right to reject all candidates by exercising the option of NOTA in EVMs and ballot papers.

The court had said: "We are of the considered view that in bringing out this right to cast negative vote at a time when electioneering is in full swing, it will foster the purity of the electoral process and also fulfil one of its objectives, namely, wide participation of people."

The Election Commission introduced NOTA in the ongoing assembly elections to five states.

In a related PIL, the apex court bench of Justice H.L. Dattu and Justice Madan B. Lakur dismissed as withdrawn a PIL seeking the quashing of amendment to the Representation of People Act that permitted incarcerated people to contest elections from jail.

The amendment passed by parliament was to overturn the July 10 verdict by which the top court held that a person convicted of a criminal offence and in jail could not contest from behind the bars.

The court had said that a person disqualified from voting is not qualified to contest election either to parliament or state assemblies.

PIL petitioner and advocate M.L.Sharma was asked to approach the high court to challenge the amendment to the Representation of People act if he so desired.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 25 2013 | 7:24 PM IST

Next Story