Justice Harun Al Rasheed ordered the CBI should complete the inquiry in nine months and all documents in these cases should be handed over to the CBI.
The petitioners in the cases were NA Sherriffa, AK Nazeer, AK Noushad and Shimitha Noushad, all from Kalamassery, near here, and Premchand Nair, Mohanchand Nair and Rama R Nair of Thiruvananthapuram. They said Salim Raj and his brother-in-law with the support of the chief minister’s office and a section of revenue department officials had forged the documents and grabbed their land in Kalamassery in Kochi and Kadakampilly near Thiruvananthapuram.
The single judge in his order said the Kerala police inquiry in these cases was not ‘satisfactory’, as it was aimed to rescue Salim Raj from the charges.
The high court in its order criticised the chief minister and his office over the alleged involvement of his personal staffers in various scams, including the solar energy scam. The court said, when allegations were made on CM's office, he had the responsibility to respond to them. The CM’s office should be a model office to the other government departments, it said.
An inquiry report filed by Revenue principal secretary, G Kamalavardhana Rao, pointed to the involvement of Salim Raj in the land grab cases. Raj along with some corrupt revenue officials committed forgery and manipulation.
There are allegations that Salim Raj, who was suspended from the CM’s office, was heading the land mafia in Kerala. A case of kidnapping was also filed against him.
The prosecution lawyer pointed out that members of CM's office were also allegedly involved in solar scam, while two are presently under suspension.
“The fact that the CM’s office members have been part of criminal activities is shocking,” the Judge said.
The court observed the chief minister has the responsibility to react on allegations against his office. He should answer to the people. He should be very careful in the appointment of his office staff. He has the responsibility in the doings of his staff members, it said.
In the order, the high court observed the alleged involvement of the personal staff members of the chief minister's office in criminal acts had come to its notice multiple times. The above incidents have raised serious questions on the functioning of the CM’s office for which the CM is answerable to the state, it said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)