Unfair to point finger at PM for file handled by babus: Tewari

Tewari said while ministers dealt with substantive issues of policy, administrative matters were handled by the secretaries

Manish Tewari
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 19 2013 | 3:51 PM IST
Rejecting Opposition's demand for the booking of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in the coal scam following filing of charges against former coal secretary PC Parakh, Union Minister Manish Tewari said "there is a difference between an administrative head and the political head of the ministry".

Maintaining that it was unfair to hold the Prime Minister responsible for the administrative decisions taken by the government at the bureaucratic level, Tewari pointed out that Singh had been holding the coal portfolio only in the interim after Shibu Soren's resignation as the then Coal Minister.

"By the time a file comes to the PM it has been processed by the coal bureaucracy and the bureaucracy within PMO. To expect the PM to scrutinise every file and then sign on it and then that being used by (Parakh) to say the PM is equally complicit, I think it's a bit of a stretch," Tewari, the Minister for Information and Broadcasting, told Karan Thapar on CNN-IBN programme 'Devil's Advocate'.

Tewari was responding to a question related to remarks by Parakh that if industrialist Kumar Mangalam Birla and himself were guilty of conspiracy, then surely former Minister of State for Coal Dasari Narayan Rao and the PM must be part of that conspiracy since the allocation could not have happened without the signatures of the two ministers.

Defending the Prime Minister, Tewari said that while ministers dealt with the substantive issues of policy, administrative matters were handled by the secretaries, who were the administrative heads of the ministry.

"There is nobody trying to escape responsibility... I am trying to make the distinction that by the time a file comes to the PM, who is the interim head of a particular ministry, it's gone through the entire coal bureaucracy," he said.

The Union Minister at the same time made it clear that merely naming somebody in an FIR and even charge-sheeting one did not make a person guilty.

"Neither an FIR or charge sheet is conclusive proof of guilt," he said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 19 2013 | 3:26 PM IST

Next Story