1993 blast case: Defence lawyers relieved to hear SC verdict

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Mar 21 2013 | 2:05 PM IST
"A great relief" if how lawyer Farhana Shah, who defended maximum number of accused in the 1993 Mumbai blasts case, summarised her reaction after the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence of 10 out of 12 convicts to life sentence.
"This is a great relief. I am happy with the judgement which has come 20 years after the accused were arrested," Shah told PTI after the verdict was announced today.
In the Supreme Court, Shah had appeared for ten accused who were given death sentence and argued on their behalf. Most of these accused did not have financial strength to fight the case in the apex court and Shah had voluntarily accepted their brief.
Among them, death punishment given to ten convicts was reduced to life imprisonment by the Supreme Court today.
Another defence lawyer Subhash Kanse said the Supreme Court's verdict in 1993 bomb blast case should be accepted with due respect.
The apex court had applied its mind to the case from all the angles and gave the verdict, he added.
Noted criminal lawyer Majid Memon, who had represented many of the accused in the Tada court in 1990s, said it was "unfortunate" that actor Sanjay Dutt will have to go to jail after the Supreme Court verdict.
Dutt will have to undergo a jail term of more than three years after the Supreme Court today upheld his conviction in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case.
"...In its (apex court) wisdom and its fairness, he(Dutt) needs to be sentenced to five years in jail, consequently he will have to go in and suffer the remaining period of jail term," Memon told media persons.
Asked whether there is any hope for Dutt to stay out of jail, Memon said that the actor has a small window for approaching a larger bench or file review "but in that case also, I am afraid that unless stay is granted on the petition on today's order. He will have to go to jail".
Memon said that "in any case first the actor will have to walk into prison and then approach the Supreme Court larger bench".
The advocate said Dutt can file a review petition but it is extremely difficult for him to get a bail.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 21 2013 | 2:05 PM IST

Next Story