"Indira Gandhi's aura was different, while the aura of Modi is diminishing. Gandhi was ousted in a poll primarily due to the anger of voters but she was again accepted by them," he told PTI refusing to draw any comparison between Modi and the late prime minister.
"Modi had got a chance but he lost it. Senior party leaders like Murli Manohar Joshi and L K Advani have been marginalised. BJP workers are feeling suffocated," the former Rajasthan chief minister said here.
Sharpening his attack, he said, "Congress never bothered for power. But I think BJP is going to meet the same fate in Uttar Pradesh as in the Assembly elections of Delhi and Bihar."
He said BIMARU states was only a new jumla (rhetoric) coined by Modi.
"BIMARU is simply a jumla and nothing else. What is the definition of BIMARU, can you tell me? In fact, Modi is an expert in telling lies," Gehlot said, adding that Modi is busy creating a rift between the rich and the poor.
Criticising the body language of the Prime Minister,
Gehlot alleged that Modi is a pro-corporate man and he is hell bent on realising his vested political and electoral interests.
"Have you seen any PM make such speeches, repeatedly clapping to emphasise on a particular point?" he asked.
On demonetisation, Gehlot said following the note ban, there was an atmosphere of uncertainty in the entire country.
"The credibility of the banks and currency notes have taken a beating. Note ban has yielded no positive results. There was no logic behind replacing the old Rs 1,000 currency notes with the new Rs 2,000 notes. There has been an increase in the quantum of corruption in Income Tax department and banks," he claimed.
"But, in the larger interest of the nation and UP, and to stop fascist and communal forces of the BJP from storming to power, the alliance was eventually approved by both the parties," he said.
He said party workers after being confused over the alliance, gradually understood its need and importance. "And, subsequently, they reconciled," he said.
On whether the nascent alliance would continue in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, he said, "All options are open."
He went on to claim that when UPA-1 had formed government in 2004, very few people had thought that it would rule the country for close to a decade.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
