Chavan's counsel Amit Desai told a division bench of justices R V More and Sadhana Jadhav that while in December 2013, the then governor had refused to grant sanction to the CBI to prosecute him, the central probing agency later sought to review the order claiming change in circumstances and fresh material in the form of evidence.
"The February 2016 order passed by Governor C Vidyasagar Rao is motivated by change in political circumstances and not by any change in evidence. The order is politically biased and motivated," Desai alleged.
In February last year, Rao had granted sanction to the CBI to prosecute Chavan for offences under IPC sections 120 (b)(criminal conspiracy) and 420 (cheating and under various provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Desai argued that in December 2013, when the then Governor K Sankaranarayanan refused permission to sanction Chavan, the CBI accepted it and in January 2014 filed an application before the special CBI court seeking to delete Chavan's name from the charge sheet.
"The decision in 2013 was passed after the then governor went through the material submitted by the CBI against Chavan and applied his mind. If CBI felt that the decision was wrong then it could have challenged it in court," he said.
"After the BJP came to power in Maharashtra, the CBI, at the behest of the state government, sought review of the 2013 order of the governor refusing sanction. The CBI did not act on its own. We allege political bias. Chavan was gaining political mileage," Desai said.
Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh today made a submission asking Chavan to delete the name of Rao as respondent in the petition and said the administrative order passed by the governor is being challenged and the petition can be heard on merits.
The court will continue hearing the petition tomorrow.
Chavan, in his petition, alleged that the governor's order was "arbitrary, illegal and unjust" and passed without "proper application of mind" and with "mala fide intentions".
The CBI had accused Chavan of approving additional floor space index for Adarsh society in return of two flats for his relatives.
He was also charged with illegally approving, as the then revenue minister, allotment of 40 per cent of the flats to civilians.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
