The high court also asked the government to extend all other benefits due to him, under a Government Resolution (GR) meant for former Army personnel from Maharashtra.
A bench of justices A S Oka and R I Chagla also imposed a cost of Rs 50,000 upon the state government and directed that the amount be paid to the petitioner, Hindurao Jagannath, within a month.
It was unfortunate that a former Army personnel had been a victim of such apathy and that he had to run from pillar to post to ask for benefits that he was entitled to, the bench observed.
According to his plea, the injuries got aggravated subsequently and resulted in a bone infection.
By the time Jagannath got discharged from the Army in 1975, the infection had resulted in a permanent disability in one of his legs.
After his discharge, Jagannath wrote several letters to the state and Union government seeking that he be granted the benefits promised under the GR issued by the state on December 30, 1971.
The GR provides that all former Army personnel from Maharashtra who sustain injuries while in service will be entitled to agricultural as well as residential land plots, and some other benefits.
In 2008, he wrote again to the Maharashtra Social Justice Department which finally forwarded his letter to the Satara district collector's office.
The collector's office and the zilla sainik welfare officer, however, rejected his request on the ground that there was no proof his injuries got aggravated while still in service.
The district level authorities also claimed that the GR was meant only for those Army personnel who received gallantry awards.
Jagannath then approached the high court through his counsel Rajesh Panchal in 2015.
Today, the bench led by Justice Oka observed that it was unfortunate and shocking that the state had shown such an apathy to a former Army personnel.
"Also, the stand taken by the zilla sainik welfare officer is shocking. His approach should have been sympathetic and positive since he was dealing with an ex-Army officer," the court said.
The bench said since the sainik welfare officer had no personal knowledge of Jagannath's injuries, he had no business to get into whether or not the same got aggravated while he was still in service or not.
The court cautioned that if its orders were not complied with, it would impose further cost on the state.
Jagannath, who had come to the high court with his wife and daughter, said he was "very relieved now".
Incidentally, the 216 Medium Regiment is celebrating its golden jubilee this year, and has invited Jagannath as one of the guests.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
