Allotment of 2 sets of symbols for candidates opposed

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Mar 17 2014 | 10:05 PM IST
: Social activist 'Traffic' Ramasamy today filed a petition in Madras High Court, opposing allotment of two sets of symbols for candidates representing recognised political parties and independents.
He said while recognised parties get permanent party symbols which they promote thorughout the year, independents are allotted a symbol just a couple of days before the election, leaving little room for them to popularise the symbole among voters.
The PIL questioned Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 and said if the practice of permanent symbols for political parties is abolished, it would end the menace of ruling parties erecting statues of their party symbols such as Elephants and Two Leaves.
He mentioned the matter today before the first bench, comprising Acting Chief Justice Satish K Agnihotri and Justice T S Sivagnanam, which then asked him to move the plea after getting it numbered and listed by the registry, possibly by Tuesday.
The Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 lays down guidelines for allotting symbols to recognised political parties and independents during every election.
As per rule 6B of the Order, a political party is treated as a recognised state party if its candidates in assembly polls secure not less than six per cent of total votes, and returned at least two MLAs. While such recognised parties are allotted or allowed to choose symbols from a set of 'reserved symbols', others and independents choose/get symbols from free list of symbols.
Describing this as discriminatory, the PIL said while the recognised political parties keep promoting their party symbols throughout the year, the independents would be allotted their symbols only a couple of weeks ahead of every election, provided their nomination papers are accepted.
A recognised party in power would be in a further position to erect permanent structures depicting its symbol, using taxpayers' money, it said.
Ramasamy said it would defeat the very core objective of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and free and fair poll process, and added that the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order should be disbanded to pave the way for level playing ground for all candidates.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 17 2014 | 10:05 PM IST

Next Story