Speaking during a briefing organised by Students Islamic Organisation (SIO) here, the outfits asked why political parties, otherwise vocal on issues of minorities, are silent at a time when the tag of the two prestigious institutions is "being played with".
"This looks like an attempt to polarise votes ahead of West Bengal and Uttar Pradesh assembly polls. This move is aimed at creating division.
Attorney General Mukul Rohtagi had told the Supreme Court over a week ago that in the opinion of the government, Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) is not a minority institution. He said as the executive government at the Centre, it can't be seen as setting up a minority institution in a secular state.
In his opinion to the HRD Ministry, Rohatgi is understood to have also quoted a 1967 Supreme Court judgement which had said that AMU is technically not a minority institution and the same principle applied to Jamia Millia Islamia.
Navaid Hamid, president of All India Majlis-e-Mushawarat, termed the AG's stand as an "assault" on the rights of minorities aimed at disturbing peace and held "people in Nagpur" - an apparent reference to RSS headquarters in the Maharashtra city - responsible for the same.
"The government is playing with fire. You are toying with fundamental rights of Muslims. Jamia Millia Islamia is also being involved now," Hamid said as he explained the "historical context" behind formation of AMU to press the point that stand Rohatgi took was "anti-Constitutional".
The organisations also released a booklet titled 'AMU's Minority Status: A Brief History' during the briefing, which was also addressed by SIO president Iqbal Hussain, vice president of JNU-Delhi students' union Shehla Shora, ex-AMU students' union chief Abdulla Azzam and Jamia Students' Forum leader Meeran Haider.
