The measure by the AP government is likely to impose an additional financial burden of Rs 30,62,31,300 per annum.
Notably, only one MLA (of the opposition YSRC) in the 175-member opposed the salary hike.
Leader of Opposition Y S Jaganmohan Reddy, however, said his party supported the Bill as YSRC members too were part of the Assembly Amenities Committee that recommended the salary hike.
Finance Minister Yanamala Ramakrishnudu moved the Bill on behalf of Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu.
"Never in history was such a Bill discussed (in the House). We have to respect the Amenities Committee," he noted.
As per the legislation passed today, which is an amendment to AP Payment of Salaries and Pension and Removal of Disqualifications Act 1953, the monthly salary of each legislator has been enhanced from Rs 95,000 to Rs 1.25 lakh.
The accommodation allowance has been doubled from Rs 25,000, while maximum pension to retired members has also been increased to Rs 50,000.
For the first time, the amended legislation provides for an annual allowance of Rs 20,000 to each member towards magazines and books.
However, YSRC member Kotamreddy Sridhar Reddy said he was opposing the Bill, according to his conscience.
"The state is reeling under severe financial crisis. People will not appreciate if we give ourselves a salary hike like this," the first-time MLA from Nellore Rural seat said.
Senior TDP legislator Bandaru Satyanarayana Murthy
replied saying: "Your leader and you may be crorepati, but there are many ordinary legislators."
"I have been an MLA for four times, but everybody knows what my financial status is. So, the hike is essential," the former minister said.
Responding to this, Jagan said he concurred with the views of Sridhar Reddy, but the party as such would not oppose the hike.
"Since my party members are also part of the Committee that recommended the hike, my party doesn't oppose it," Jagan said, but suggested that the government might consider reducing the quantum of hike.
Replying to this, the Finance Minister said the government did not accept Amenities Committee recommendations in toto because of the state's financial position.
"If your party as a whole opposes the hike, I am ready to withdraw the Bill. I can save money," Yanamala said.
"Given the financial status, we are enhancing the salaries to the best of our possibilities," he added.
The House then adopted the Bill by voice vote.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
