As the stage was set for the arguments to begin, Peter's lawyer Abad Ponda said the defence had received copies of the second supplementary charge-sheet only yesterday, and it had not been given statement of one of the witnesses and some other documents the prosecution was relying on.
CBI judge H S Mahajan consented to adjourning the matter but said statement of the witness cannot be given at this stage when charges are yet to be framed.
"This court assures that the statement would be provided to the accused once charges are framed," the court said.
Sheena (24), Indrani's daughter from an earlier relationship, was strangled in a car here in April 2012 allegedly by Indrani, Khanna and Indrani's former driver Shyamvar Rai. Sheena's body was then dumped in a forest in neighbouring Raigad district.
The agency in its charge sheet countered Peter's
arguments that he was falsely implicated in the case and was not aware about the alleged murder. CBI claimed that the ex-media baron was very much in the know of the conspiracy hatched by Indrani to kill Sheena.
CBI claimed Peter was also informed by Indrani on selection of spot for disposal of the body.
According to the charge sheet, Indrani and Peter were against the "intimate relationship" between Sheena and Rahul, Peter's son from his first wife. He often used to quarrel with Rahul on the issue as he didn't approve of the relationship between Sheena and his son.
Peter was initially fine with the relationship between Sheena and Rahul believing it would eventually wane over financial pressures, CBI said.
