Arguments on framing of charges adjourned till Nov 15

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Oct 22 2016 | 7:32 PM IST
A special CBI court here today adjourned till November 15 commencement of arguments on framing of charges against former media baron Peter Mukerjea, his wife Indrani and her ex-husband Sanjeev Khanna for murder of Sheena Bora, after Peter's lawyer sought time to prepare, a day after CBI filed its second supplementary charge sheet.
As the stage was set for the arguments to begin, Peter's lawyer Abad Ponda said the defence had received copies of the second supplementary charge-sheet only yesterday, and it had not been given statement of one of the witnesses and some other documents the prosecution was relying on.
"We need time to prepare. But looking at the evidence submitted by the prosecution, I can say that there is no case made out to even frame charges against the accused," he said.
CBI judge H S Mahajan consented to adjourning the matter but said statement of the witness cannot be given at this stage when charges are yet to be framed.
"This court assures that the statement would be provided to the accused once charges are framed," the court said.
Sheena (24), Indrani's daughter from an earlier relationship, was strangled in a car here in April 2012 allegedly by Indrani, Khanna and Indrani's former driver Shyamvar Rai. Sheena's body was then dumped in a forest in neighbouring Raigad district.
The crime came to light only last year when Rai was arrested in another case. Rai later turned approver in the Sheena murder case.
The agency in its charge sheet countered Peter's
arguments that he was falsely implicated in the case and was not aware about the alleged murder. CBI claimed that the ex-media baron was very much in the know of the conspiracy hatched by Indrani to kill Sheena.
CBI claimed Peter was also informed by Indrani on selection of spot for disposal of the body.
According to the charge sheet, Indrani and Peter were against the "intimate relationship" between Sheena and Rahul, Peter's son from his first wife. He often used to quarrel with Rahul on the issue as he didn't approve of the relationship between Sheena and his son.
As per the charge sheet, Peter always dissuaded Khanna's daughter from Indrani, Vidhie, from having any contact with Rahul and Sheena.
Peter was initially fine with the relationship between Sheena and Rahul believing it would eventually wane over financial pressures, CBI said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 22 2016 | 7:32 PM IST

Next Story