The Delhi High Court told the AAP government on Friday to come out with an alternative plan to reduce the increasing monkey population in the national capital if it was not finding any bidders for its tenders to sterilise the simians.
A bench of Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice V K Rao told the Delhi government if no one bid for its tenders, it "cannot just sit back and do nothing".
"Tell us what is the alternative. You have to indicate what steps can be taken to sterilise the monkeys as ordered by the court," the bench said.
The observations and direction from the bench came after the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) told the court that it "lacked the expertise" and was ill-equipped to catch monkeys.
Advocate Gaurang Kanth, appearing for the SDMC, made the submission before the bench while seeking modification of the court's 2007 direction to it to catch monkeys and relocate them in the Ridge area of the city.
The SDMC told the court that according to a central government's advisory, local bodies are advised not to carry out the exercise of catching monkeys and the task has been left to the respective state governments.
The Delhi government told the court that it had floated two tenders for catching and sterilising monkeys, but it found no takers.
It also said that the local bodies, like SDMC, have the resources to carry out the exercise.
The bench, however, asked the Delhi government to inform it about an alternative plan of action and listed the matter for further hearing on January 29 next year.
The court was hearing a public interest litigation filed by advocate Meera Bhatia for directions to the authorities to take steps to deal with the menace of monkeys in the city.
The court had earlier noted that the problem of increasing monkey population was "aggravating with each passing day" and that the increase in simian numbers would not wait for testing of the oral vaccine for sterilising them.
NGO Wildlife SOS had earlier told the court that monkey population is rapidly increasing in urban areas due to the easy access to food, especially in garbage, as compared to forest areas where they have to forage for food.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
