NIA counsel Sandesh Patil today told a division bench of Justices R V More and Shalini Phansalkar Joshi that though the ATS theory was correct, the probe was not properly conducted.
"It was not coherent and thus NIA couldn't accept it as it was. We tried to fill those gaps when we took over the probe," Patil said.
The bench was hearing the appeal filed by one of the main accused Prasad Purohit challenging a sessions court order rejecting his bail application.
Purohit has sought bail on the grounds that he has been in custody for eight long years and that the probe agency had not obtained proper sanction for his prosecution under the Unlawful Activities prevention Act.
The court will continue to hear arguments tomorrow.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
