The controversy surrounding Atwal erupted last month after he was photographed with Trudeau's wife Sophie Gregoire and other senior officials at the event in Mumbai as part of Trudeau's first state visit to India.
He was also invited to the dinner reception at the residence of the Canadian High Commissioner in Delhi during Trudeau's week-long visit. The invitation was later withdrawn.
After several days of silence, Atwal finally addressed the situation at his lawyer's office in Vancouver yesterday.
Reading from a prepared statement, he said he was "shocked and devastated" when controversy exploded over his attendance at the event.
"I had assumed there would be no problem. No one at any point indicated there would be any issue," said Atwal.
Atwal said he has "nothing but regret and remorse" for his role in the 1986 attack on Sidhu, adding he is no longer a supporter of the Sikh independence movement.
"I, like the vast majority of Sikhs who once advocated for this cause, have reconciled with the nation of India," he was quoted as saying by CBC News.
"I have nothing but regret and remorse for my actions and the suffering I caused to the victim. What I did was described as an act of terror by the judge who dealt with this matter. I accept full responsibility. I do not disagree with the court's conclusions," he said.
Meanwhile, Indian-origin Liberal MP Randeep Sarai said in a statement that he was responsible for the invitation to Atwal.
Atwal told reporters that he was travelling to India this year, and asked Sarai if he could attend an event with Canadian politicians during Trudeau's visit.
"I was eventually provided invitation by the Canadian ambassador and attended a reception," Atwal said.
He also said that he has associated with politicians from Canada's three major political parties.
Atwal never illegally entered India and has visited a number of times since his release from prison, Gill said.
Gill said Atwal went through the "proper channels" to get an invitation to the event, adding those who feign ignorance about his criminal past are being disingenuous.
"He was a political embarrassment to the prime minister, that's obviously accepted ... but let's make sure this is on the record Mr. Atwal presents absolutely no security threat to this country or any other country," Gill added.
"At all times I visited India lawfully and with the full permission of the Indian government," he claimed.
Opposition parties in Ottawa have also demanded an explanation after reports emerged that an unnamed Canadian official blamed factions in the Indian government for Atwal's presence at the event a claim that Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer called "a conspiracy theory that is unsupported by any proof," the report said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
