Australia removed from UN climate report over tourism fears

Image
AFP Sydney
Last Updated : May 27 2016 | 6:22 PM IST
All references to Australia were removed from a UN report on climate change and World Heritage sites after objections from Canberra, in a move scientists and activists today called "extremely disturbing".
The study, World Heritage and Tourism in a Changing Climate, was jointly published yesterday by UNESCO, the Union of Concerned Scientists and the United Nations Environmental Programme.
It profiles the impacts of climate change on major tourism drawcards including the Statue of Liberty, Venice and Stonehenge, listing 31 vulnerable sites in 29 countries.
Initially it contained a chapter on Australia's Great Barrier Reef, which is suffering its worst bleaching in recorded history, and sections on Kakadu National Park and the Tasmanian Wilderness, scientists said.
But when the Australian Department of Environment saw a draft, it objected and every mention of Australia was removed.
The department told AFP it "indicated" to UNESCO that "it did not support any of Australia's World Heritage properties being included" in the study.
"The department was concerned that the framing of the report confused two issues - the World Heritage status of the sites and risks arising from climate change and tourism," it said in a statement.
"Recent experience in Australia had shown that negative commentary about the status of World Heritage properties impacted on tourism."
The reef, which contributes an estimated USD 4.3 billion annually to the economy, mainly through tourism, last year narrowly avoided being put on the World Heritage endangered list.
Will Steffen, one of the scientific reviewers of the axed section on the reef, said he was stunned.
"It beggars belief that Australia would not even rate a mention," he said.
"To argue that this is about tourism doesn't make much sense. No other country requested sections to be removed from the report.
"Information is the currency of democracy, and the idea that government officials would exert pressure to censor scientific information on our greatest natural treasure is extremely disturbing," he added.
Greenpeace called it "jaw-dropping news".
"Especially while the Great Barrier Reef is suffering from its worst-ever coral bleaching," said Greenpeace Australia reef campaigner Shani Tager.
"They're trying to pull wool over Australians' eyes about serious threats to the future of our greatest natural wonder."
The world's biggest coral reef ecosystem is under pressure from not only climate change, but farming run-off, development and the coral-eating crown-of-thorns starfish.
Last month scientists warned large parts of it would be dead within 20 years if climate change was not tackled.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 27 2016 | 6:22 PM IST

Next Story