"Whether others believe in the death of Perumalmurugan as a writer or not, I believe in it. A writer cannot function under threat or fear," he said in the affidavit filed before the first bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M M Sundresh.
Murugan apologised for not coming in person and prayed for an order to uphold a writer's fundamental right to free speech and expression.
Describing the sequence of events that made him give the apology, Murugan said he was terribly mentally confused. The unbearable mental stress he and his wife underwent in weeks preceding the meet determined their version's tone.
"Our family had been living in virtual exile. My wife felt that if tendering an unconditional apology alone would help defuse the situation, I could take the decision and she also added that I should not suffer any inner breakdown," he said.
Murugan submitted the function of a writer is to question social values and subject them to critical examination and said a writer must not mechanically accept anything.
"Society which frames the rules also provides for exceptions. It is natural for a writer to focus his writing on the exceptions. When society insists on the rules, the writer will highlight the exceptions. That's how it is possible to perceive things from the side of the victim. Otherwise the voice of the victim and marginalized will go unheard."
It then issued notice to all authorities concerned in the connected petitions filed on behalf of S Tamil Selvan of Tamil Nadu Progressive Writers and Artists Association and posted the matter after three weeks to enable the authorities and other respondents who objected to the novel to file counters.
The novel revolves around the travails of a childless couple and also deals with consensual sex between any man and childless woman to conceive during the annual temple car festival at Tiruchengode in Tamil Nadu.
The author had, however, denied it and apologised if he had hurt any sections of people.
