The government notified the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, ensuring that the ban on sale and consumption of alcohol, including Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL), as well spiced and domestic liquor continued in the state despite the high court holding it "ultra vires of the Constitution".
At a special meeting of the state cabinet called on Gandhi Jayanti, Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and other members of his Cabinet took a pledge to continue with prohibition which they said was "ushering in positive social change" in the state.
All adults of a family are liable to be arrested if liquor was found at their house. Collective fine would be slapped on villages and urban clusters in case of habitual violation of the prohibition law.
There is provision of three years' jail and a penalty of Rs 1 lakh, or with both for such errant officers.
Principal Secretary (Cabinet Secretariat) Brajesh Mehrotra usually briefs the media about Cabinet decisions, but today Nitish Kumar informed reporters about the new law and fielded questions from them.
Kumar said the new law would be a real tribute to the father of the nation at a time when the state was readying for observing the centenary celebrations of Mahatma Gandhi's Champaran Satyagraha against the British rule from early 2017.
Defending his government's decision on prohibition, Kumar referred to the Supreme Court's order that sale and consumption of liquor is not a fundamental right of a citizen.
"Besides it is in tune with the Directive Principles of the state policy. I am following Constitutional duty," he said.
Kumar was dismissive about main opposition BJP asking the government not to take any hasty decision while bringing in a new prohibition law which might not pass legal scrutiny again.
The court has given some exemptions to Sikkim, Meghalaya
and Himachal Pradesh. It also held that areas with a population up to 20,000 may have liquor vends at a distance of 220 metres from the highways.
Not a single liquor outlet was open on Kona Expressway, Bombay Road. Some had even "Bar Closed" notices. Several bars in the districts of Howrah, Hooghly, South and North 24 Parganas, Burdwan were also shut.
However, bars alongside the EM Bypass, VIP Road, and parts of Jessore Road were having business as usual as the state government had recently dropped them from the list of state highways.
A few residents of the Kona Expressway alleged that liquor were sold through the rear door of shops which had their front doors closed.
"A bar owner, shocked by the order of the apex court said,"We were completely surprised by the order. We do not know what to do now. Our business has been badly affected."
In Rajasthan, out of the total 7760liquorshops in the state,2800 fell within the 500 meter radius from highways.
"Nearly 2800 shops in Rajasthan were affected due to the Supreme court order. Most of the shops were shifted elsewhere from their highway location and remaining few were closed because of non-availability of suitable location," O P Yadav, the Excise Commissioner said.
The Rajasthan government officer said that the impact of the decision on the revenue collection would only be assessed after first quarter of the new financial year.
Haryana government officials expect about 200 bars will be closed down in the wake of the order while the Punjab officials say they are work out the exact number.
There could be estimated revenue foregone to the tune of Rs 100 crore, the official said
An office bearer of Chandigarh Hotel and Restaurant
association said because of closure of bars in the city, a large number of people employed in these shops would be jobless.
(REOPENS DEL30)
In Gurugram, restaurants and hotels chains owners have joined hands and are planning to meet union minister of Tourism and culture Mahesh Sharma and Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar on Monday.
Kapil Chopra, President, the Oberoi Group and Former Chairperson of WTTC said "We completely respect the Supreme Court judgement but with thousands of bars and restaurant will be affected in India."
He said tourists love to visit India but they may find it unappealing if they are not allowed to have a glass of beer or wine in a hotel.
He said it is better to have a stricter drunken driving law.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
