Bill to check piling up of cheque bounce cases moved in LS

Jaitley introduced the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Bill, 2015, which will help in 'ensuring' a fair trial of cases under Section 138 that deals with cheques being not honoured

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 06 2015 | 6:53 PM IST
A Bill seeking to prevent piling up of cheque bounce cases in various courts and help the payee in the case of default, was introduced in Lok Sabha today.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley introduced the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Bill, 2015, which would help in "ensuring" a fair trial of cases under Section 138 that deals with cheques being not honoured, keeping in view the "interests of the complainant".

"To address the difficulties faced by the payee or the lender of the money in filing the case under Section 138, because of which large number of cases are stuck, the jurisdiction for offence... Has been clearly defined," the Statement on Objects and Reasons of the Bill said.

If Parliament passes the Bill, then cases can only be filed in a court under whose jurisdiction the bank branch of the payee where the cheque is presented falls.

ALSO READ: Taxation policy has to be non-adversarial: Arun Jaitley

While approving the amendment, the government had said it is aimed at fast tracking the resolution of cheque bounce cases while removing ambiguities on jurisdictional issues.

"The clarity on jurisdictional issue for trying cases of cheque bouncing would increase the credibility of the cheque as a financial instrument. This would help trade and commerce in general and allow lending institutions, including banks, to continue to extend financing to the economy, without the apprehension of the loan default on account of bouncing of a cheque," an official statement had said earlier.


Section 138 of the NI Act deals with the offence pertaining to dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds in the drawer's account. It also provides for penalties in case of dishonour of cheques.

The amendments have been proposed in the backdrop of difficulties expressed by various stakeholders arising out of the recent legal interpretation of the place of jurisdiction for filing cases under the Section to be the place of drawers' bank by the Supreme Court.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 06 2015 | 6:08 PM IST

Next Story