"Once the designated authority has given approval, you cannot say prima facie you have case over that. Till that (approval) is disturbed by an order of the court, it will remain," a bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva said.
The observation of the court came after the DCGI, represented by Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain, confirmed that the medicines and the package inserts of the two companies were granted approval for marketing and sale.
The court was hearing the pleas of Roche and other pharma firms like Biocon, Mylan and Reliance Life Sciences, on the issue of marketing and sale of generic drugs biosimilar to the Swiss company's Trastuzumab.
It is Roche's contention that Biocon, Mylan and Reliance cannot term their medicine as merely Trastuzumab and ought to call it Biocon's Trastuzumab or Mylan's Trastuzumab as these companies have not followed the entire protocol of tests and studies, as was done by it.
In response, Biocon said it manufactures the medicine for both the companies, but they sell it under different names. While Biocon sells it as Canmab, Mylan sells it under the name of Hertraz, the court was told.
On the last date of hearing, the court had told Roche
that it "cannot hang on to" breast cancer drug Trastuzumab, innovated by it, for the rest of its life after having enjoyed the fruits of its patent.
It had also said that Roche cannot in a civil suit challenge the approvals granted by DCGI.
However, both companies claim to have approvals from DCGI to sell their respective medicines for the other two cancers also, a decision which has been challenged by Roche in its civil suit claiming "passing off" of its breast cancer drugs by the two companies.
Biocon and Mylan have taken the stand that Roche no longer holds a patent in India for Trastuzumab.
