Officials said investigating agencies like Enforcement Directorate (ED) had asked the Special Investigation Team (SIT) on black money that some "inadequacies" in the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) pose a hindrance in prosecuting a defaulter or violator of this law, especially those who undertake hawala or illegal remittances operations.
They said acting on these inputs, the SIT has suggested the government to bring an amendment in FEMA by introducing a new clause under section 14 (enforcement of the orders of Adjudicating Authority) of the Act which will allow probe agencies to attach domestic assets of a defaulter on the lines of a similar power given to them under anti-money laundering laws.
The Budget speech of Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on February 29 may have this amendment coming.
Under the criminal provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), the ED is empowered to attach assets and the clause in the Act is aimed to deprive the accused from deriving benefits of their ill-gotten wealth, from the stage of investigation itself.
Under the civil proceedings of FEMA, the agency is only empowered to "confiscate" properties and foreign exchange holdings of a person who contravenes the said Act and there is a provision to bring them back to the country also.
While there is a provision of a short jail term for wilful defaulters under FEMA there is no power under law which enables investigators to get remitted the defaulted amount by way of attaching and subsequent sale of the seized assets, the official said.
"The jail term in FEMA is for only six months time and that stage too comes at a very late stage when penalty is raised after long years of litigation. Not many defaulters see this as a deterrent in their illegal acts," the official said.
IDS, the FAQ said a revised filing could be made.
The period of holding of assets declared under the Scheme would be taken on the basis of the actual date of acquisition of such asset and not from June 1, 2016, the day declaration window under IDS opened.
Declarants have also been assured that no adverse action would be taken against them by Financial Intelligence Unit of the tax department solely on the basis of cash deposits made in banks under the Scheme.
Meanwhile, RBI has been asked to issue instruction to banks to accept payment of tax and penalty in cash under the scheme.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
