Blueline bus driver gets 2-year in jail for killing pedestrian

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 19 2017 | 4:01 PM IST
A Delhi court has awarded two years in jail to a driver of now-defunct blueline bus service in a road accident case, saying "his callous driving" resulted in the death of an elderly woman crossing road in 2009.
Additional Sessions Judge Gautam Manan upheld a trial court order convicting Sunil, a resident of southwest Delhi, saying he was driving a commercial vehicle and did not take expected care and caution for avoiding any untoward incident.
"Facts of the case show that appellant (driver) was driving a commercial vehicle and did not take expected care and caution for avoiding any untoward incident and hit against an old age pedestrian crossing the road near the bus stand.
"Thus, it is concluded that entire evidence was meticulously scrutinised by trial court while convicting appellant. Same does not suffer from any infirmity which calls for interference," the court said while dismissing his appeal against the trial court order.
The sessions court also upheld the magisterial court's order imposing Rs 5,000 as fine on Sunil.
The court also rejected his plea for probation.
"Appellant was driving a blueline bus and hit an old lady crossing the road and thus, his callous driving which resulted into a death and his act does not entitle him to be released on Probation," the court said.
Blueline buses were phased out from Delhi roads in 2011, paving way for the cluster bus service.
According to the prosecution, 60-year-old Kalpana Goswami was hit by a blueline bus on October 22, 2009, when she was crossing the road near Jai Vihar bus stand, Dichao Kal Depot here.
Sunil questioned the veracity of the prime witness, who was the son of Goswami, saying the trial court has wrongly relied upon the testimony of the complainant being an interested witness and was having personal interest in the case.
The court rejected this claim and said that merely because the complainant is the son of the deceased cannot be a ground to discard his testimony especially when there is no ground to doubt his presence at the spot.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 19 2017 | 4:00 PM IST

Next Story