'Breath test may help detect stomach, oesophageal cancers'

A new non-invasive test that measures the levels of five chemicals in the breath may help detect stomach and oesophageal cancers, according to a large patient trial.
Together, stomach and oesophageal cancer account for around 1.4 million new cancer diagnoses each year worldwide, researchers said.
Both tend to be diagnosed late, because the symptoms are ambiguous, meaning the five-year survival rate for these two types of cancer is only 15 per cent.
The new research, involving more than 300 patients, showed that the test could diagnose cancer with an overall accuracy of 85 per cent.
"At present the only way to diagnose oesophageal cancer or stomach cancer is with endoscopy. This method is expensive, invasive and has some risk of complications," said Sheraz Markar from Imperial College London in the UK.

"A breath test could be used as a non-invasive, first-line test to reduce the number of unnecessary endoscopies. In the longer term this could also mean earlier diagnosis and treatment, and better survival," said Markar.

The trial was based on the results of previous research that suggested differences in the levels of specific chemicals (butyric, pentanoic and hexanoic acids, butanal, and decanal) between patients with stomach or oesophageal cancer and patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms without cancer.
The new research aimed to test whether this 'chemical signature' that seemed to typify cancer could be the basis of a diagnostic test.

The research team collected breath samples from 335 people. Of these, 163 had been diagnosed with stomach or oesophageal cancer and 172 showed no evidence of cancer when they had an endoscopy.
All the samples were analysed with a technique called selected ion flow-tube mass spectrometry, which is able to accurately measure small amounts of different chemicals in mixtures of gases such as breath.
Researchers measured the levels of the five chemicals in each sample to see which ones matched to the 'chemical signature' that indicated cancer.
The results showed that the test was 85 per cent accurate overall, with a sensitivity of 80 per cent and a specificity of 81 per cent.

This means that not only was the breath test good at picking up those who had cancer (sensitivity), it was also good at correctly identifying who did not have cancer (specificity).
Over the next three years, the researchers will continue with a larger trial, using the test with patients who are being given an endoscopy for gastrointestinal symptoms but not yet diagnosed with cancer.
The team is also working on breath tests for other types of cancer, such as colorectal and pancreatic, which could be used as first-line tests in general practice surgeries.