British judge insists burqa-clad woman must show face

Image
Press Trust of India London
Last Updated : Aug 23 2013 | 4:46 PM IST
A British judge has insisted that a burqa-clad woman must show her face in court to confirm her identity, saying the "principle of open justice" could not be subject to religion.
Judge Peter Murphy said he would not allow the 21-year-old defendant to stand trial in the veil, which only revealed her eyes, because a different person could go into the dock pretending to be her.
"It is necessary for this court to be satisfied that they can recognise the defendant. While I obviously respect the right to dress in any way she wishes, certainly while outside the court, the interests of justice are paramount," he said.
During a hearing at Blackfriars Crown Court here yesterday, Murphy said he could not accept a plea from a person whose identity he was unable to ascertain.
He stressed that "the principle of open justice" could not be subject to the religion of the defendant.
"It would be easy for someone on a later occasion to appear and claim to be the defendant. The court would have no way to check on that," he said.
According to The Daily Telegraph, the Muslim woman from Hackney in east London, whose identity cannot be revealed for legal reasons, says she cannot remove the veil in front of any men because of her religion.
She is facing an allegation of intimidating a witness in Finsbury Park, north London, in June.
The woman's barrister, Claire Burtwistle, told the court she was not prepared to lower her veil at all while men were in the courtroom.
"In front of women, it is not an issue. It is simply men that she will not allow to see her face," she said.
Burtwistle suggested that she, a female police officer or a female prison guard could identify the defendant and confirm to the court that it was the same person as in the police arrest photos.
Prosecutor Sarah Counsell said the police officer in charge of the case was content that he recognised the defendant while she was in the burqa.
But the judge rejected these suggestions and adjourned the case till September 12, when the court will hear arguments over whether the woman should remove her veil.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 23 2013 | 4:46 PM IST

Next Story