Education Minister Naeem Akhtar also ruled out any probe into these incidents, saying, "One does not have to research for the source of this huge conspiracy against the hapless people of Kashmir."
In a statement here, he said, "burning of schools is one of the ploys to keep the fire burning (in Kashmir)... It is the same people who are promoting looting of banks, torching of shops and vehicles, stoning innocents, intimidation of citizens, who are responsible for burning the educational institutes."
Asserting that "no inquiry is needed to find out who is behind all this", the minister said, "It is those people who have created this tirade against education, because they see it as a threat to their vested interests."
Akhtar said the separatists had mounted a tiger and are now trying hard to keep the conflict going.
Defending his decision to hold Board examinations as per
schedule, the Education Minister said the government is not trying to invent or impose anything new in the academic arena of the state.
Referring to the Malik's statement that the burning of schools in Kashmir was a conspiracy to defame the separatist leaders, Akhtar said, "those saying that government decision to hold exams has forced students to torch the educational institutes should go for a self-introspection".
The Education Minister appealed to people from all schools of thought to keep the education conflict-neutral.
"Just see Palestine or the recent happenings in Aleppo, Syria. Their schools are never shut even if there are bombings, killings and full-fledged war. They know that education is the key and in no way they can stop education.
"In Kashmir too, we faced unfortunate deaths for which all of us are heartbroken and pained, but for saving the future generation, education has to go on," he said.
Taking on Yasin Malik, Akhtar said, "It is the examination time for leaders like Mohammad Yasin Malik who is now facing questions from the people over the way they are pushing Kashmiris into perpetual economic and academic disempowerment."
He also asked him to clarify whether he is with militancy or non-violence.
"Now I want to ask him whether he stands with violence or Gandhi Ji's principles of non-violence. Has he again changed his thoughts? Akhtar asked.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
