CAA brouhaha caused by suspicion about govt's intentions:

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 03 2020 | 8:01 PM IST

The Vajpayee government was never questioned for amending the Citizenship Act in 2003, but suspicion about the current regime's intentions led to nationwide protests, former minister Yashwant Sinha said here on Monday.

Dismissing the government's argument that amendment to the Citizenship Act was part of the BJP's poll promises, Sinha asked if a manifesto can "supercede" the Constitution.

The Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) is against the the Constitution as it discriminates on the ground of religion, he told PTI on the sidelines of an event at St Xavier's College here.

"They (Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah) are completely contradicting what they said earlier," the former BJP leader said.

Both were "scared" because of the nationwide protests, which led them to go back on promise to implement the National Register of Citizens (NRC) across the country, Sinha said.

All political parties had supported the amendment to citizenship laws carried out during the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government in 2003, he said.

"Do you remember any protests (happening) in 2003? I don't remember any. No hackles were raised. We talked about a national register of Indian citizens being prepared, though it was left vague because the rules were to be framed later," he said.

"Why has CAA caused so much disruption? Because people go by the intention of the government. In Vajpayee's time, they didn't suspect the intention of the government. In the present situation, they suspect the intention behind this move," the former Union minister said.

He also argued that with Aadhar in place, there was no need for a National Population Register (NPR), as biometric details of people are already with the government.

The difficulties during the NRC exercise in Assam tells us what kind of mayhem it will cause if carried out nationwide, Sinha said.

The bureaucrat-turned-politician also attacked Modi, comparing him to medieval ruler Muhammad bin Tughluq, for pushing ahead with the Rajpath revamp plan at a time when the economy is in the middle of a slowdown.

He blamed the government for focusing only on supply side measures to reverse the slowdown and not pushing up demand, which he said was "dead".

Instead of corporate tax cuts which would lead to revenue loss of Rs 1.46 lakh crore, same quantum of relief

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 03 2020 | 8:00 PM IST

Next Story