CAG finds fault with T-govt on poor management of finances

Image
Press Trust of India Hyderabad
Last Updated : Mar 28 2017 | 12:28 PM IST
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has found fault with the Telangana government for poor management of finances on various counts during the year ended March 2016.
"The state registered revenue surplus of Rs 238 crore during 2015-16. It is overstated due to mis-classification of grants-in-aid (Rs 151 crore) under capital heads and crediting off-budget borrowings (Rs 3,719 crore) to revenue receipts," the CAG said in its report on 'State Finances'.
Fiscal deficit which stood at 3.23 per cent of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) is understated by (Rs 3,719 crore) due to crediting off budget borrowing to revenue receipts, it said.
"It would have the effect of increasing the ratio of fiscal deficit to GSDP from 3.23 per cent to 3.87 per cent," it said.
Many instances of unrealistic budgetary assumptions and weaknesses in expenditure monitoring and control were observed during the year, the report, tabled in the just-concluded Assembly session, said.
"Actual expenditure (Rs 1,04,098 crore) incurred was less than the budget provision (Rs 1,39,360 crore) and savings for the current year stood at Rs 35,262 crore (25 per cent). Out of the savings, Rs 16,269 crore were surrendered on 31 March, 2016," it said.
Several policy initiatives taken up by the government remained either unfulfilled or were partially executed primarily due to non-approval of the scheme guidelines, non-commencement of works for want of administrative sanction and poor project implementation, apart from the non-release of funds, the government auditor said.
Excess expenditure of Rs 5,881 crore was incurred during 2015-16 without legislative authorisation.
"Lumpsum provisions (Rs 55 crore) without specific details of expenditure were included in the budget for 2015-16.
"The entire provision was surrendered at the end of the year. There were several instances of budgetary mis-classifications on subsidies, subvention from Central Road Fund etc, which indicated deficiencies in budget formulation," it said.
Unrealistic budgetary allocations resulting in substantial savings, unnecessary supplementary grants, expenditure incurred without provision and excess re-appropriations, resulting in excess provision were indicative of poor budget management, the CAG said.
The report also said there were delays in submission of annual accounts by several autonomous bodies which diluted the accountability and defeated the very purpose of preparation of accounts.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 28 2017 | 12:28 PM IST

Next Story