Last month, it wrote to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley reminding him of the government’s promise to appoint an arbitrator “soon”.
Cairn, on March 10, had sought arbitration under the India-UK Bilateral Investment Protection Agreement disputing the tax demand raised on a 2006 internal business reorganisation, but the government initially refused to join it, saying tax disputes were not covered under the bilateral treaty. The British firm in September moved The Hague-based ICJ, seeking appointment of an arbitrator on behalf of the government.
The government at this stage told Cairn, as well as ICJ, that an arbitrator will be appointed soon. Sources said Cairn was willing to suspend its application before ICJ if the government was to name its arbitrator by Wednesday. If not, it will press ICJ to name an arbitrator on behalf of India so that proceedings begin.
Cairn has already named former Bulgarian minister Stanimir A Alexandrov as its arbitrator in the matter. Now, an arbitrator for India has to be appointed.
The two arbitrators will then appoint a neutral presiding judge of the three-member Arbitral Tribunal.
The bilateral treaty provides for either of parties approaching ICJ in case the other party does not appoint an arbitrator within six months of a dispute being raised.
Sources said Cairn told Jaitley that it will press ICJ for appointment of an arbitrator on behalf of India if the government did not name an arbitrator within stipulated time.
The Income Tax Department says Cairn Energy allegedly made a capital gain of Rs 24,503.50 crore in 2006 while transferring all its India assets to a new company, Cairn India, and getting it listed on the stock exchanges.
Cairn Energy, which had in 2011 sold majority stake in its Indian unit to mining group Vedanta for USD 8.67 billion, still holds 9.8 per cent stake in Cairn India. But it has been barred by the I-T Department from selling this stake.
The value of the shareholding in Cairn India has halved since attachment.
Disputing any capital gains made out of an internal business reorganisation, Cairn wants the Tribunal to scrap the notice, give it cost of arbitration and compensate it for the loss of value of its shareholding in Cairn India which the Income Tax Department had attached following the January 2014 tax assessment notice.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
