CCI dismisses complaint against distributor of 'Vivo' handsets Fangs Technology

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 08 2018 | 6:10 PM IST

The Competition Commission has dismissed a case alleging unfair business practices against Fangs Technology, engaged in business of trading and distribution of 'Vivo' mobile handsets, with regard to distributorship agreement.

Noting that "no contravention of either section 3 or section 4 of the Act is made out" against Fangs Technology Pvt Ltd, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) ordered the closure of the matter.

While Section 3 deals with anti-competitive agreements, Section 4 pertains to abuse of dominant market position.

The ruling came on the complaint filed by Tamil Nadu Consumer Products Distributors Association alleging unreasonable and unfair conditions imposed on distributors after entering into ''Vivo distributorship agreement" with Fangs Technology.

For the case, the fair trade regulator considered the 'market for smartphones in India', as the relevant one and also observed that Fangs was not in dominant position in it.

On the allegation with regard to Fangs imposing restriction on its distributors in doing business with 'Oppo' and 'Honor', CCI said the conduct is not "anti competitive" as the agreement allows its distributors to do business with other competing brands except the two and that several distributors are dealing in other competing brands as well.

Regarding other allegations like resale price maintenance, prior approval for appointment of a retailer by a distributor, no credit facility been given to the distributors, distributor to perform corporate sales only after prior intimation, the regulator observed that no evidence has been adduced by the complainant to substantiate them.

Further the complainant "has failed to show that the clauses of the distributorship agreement have anti-competitive effects in the market," CCI said in an order dated Oct 4.

Accordingly, CCI held that no contravention of either section 3 or section 4 of the Competition Act is made out against Fangs Technology and thereby "closed" the matter.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 08 2018 | 6:10 PM IST

Next Story