CCI rejects complaint against Haryana discom

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 17 2016 | 9:22 PM IST
Fair trade regulator CCI has rejected charges of abuse of market dominance against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam (DHBVN), a power distribution company in that state.
The complaint was also filed against Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (HERC) and the state government.
It was alleged that even though fuel prices have been declining, DHBVN kept on increasing the fuel cost surcharge adjustment (FSA).
FSA, which is determined on the basis of any fuel price variations incurred on the input costs in the supply chain of electricity, is passed on to the consumers.
Further, it was alleged that DHBVN has been imposing differential FSA based on the quantity of power consumed and thereby discriminating between the consumers.
For the case, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) considered the 'market for distribution of electricity in the licensed area of OP-1 (DHBVN) in the State of Haryana' as the relevant one.
DHBVN is an electricity distribution company owned by the Haryana government and is licensed by HERC to exclusively supply electricity in nine districts of the state.
Dismissing the complaint, CCI said, "... No fact or figure has been provided to substantiate the purported decline in the price of fuel used for power generation leading to a decline in the cost of power generation."
It added: "In the absence of any cogent material supporting these claims, it would be difficult to construe any unfairness regarding the quantum of FSA levied."
On allegations of discriminatory pricing, the regulator said the way in which customers are classified for charging FSA "appears to have economic justification based on market segmentation and does not amount to discriminatory conduct".
Further CCI said, as DHBVN charges FSA, as per the regulations framed by HERC, any person aggrieved by the decision of a state electricity regulatory commission could appeal such decision before the Appellate Authority under the Electricity Act, 2003.
The complaint was filed by one Anand Parkash Agarwal, residing in Gurgaon, under Section 4 of the Competition Act, which pertains to abuse of dominant market position.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 17 2016 | 9:22 PM IST

Next Story