The complaint filed collectively by 22 individuals had alleged that the company was misleading the public by collecting money from them by issuing policy/bonds with a promise to pay them the amount on maturity with agreed returns or to allot them plots of land.
However, the firm failed to pay the money along with assured returns to the informants on maturity of their bond/ policy.
The watchdog noted that as per the allegations, the company cheated and defrauded the informants.
The Commission concluded that "no case of contravention of any of the provisions of either Section 3 or 4 of the Act is made out against any of the company in the instant matter".
While Section 3 of the Competition Act pertains to anti- competitive practices, Section 4 relates to abuse of dominant position.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
