CCTV cameras in courts: Dedicated cells be set up in HCs for viewing footage, says SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 05 2018 | 10:15 PM IST

The Supreme Court today said that dedicated cells should be constituted in high courts where footage of CCTV cameras installed in courts across the country could be viewed from time to time.

A bench of Justices A K Goel and R F Nariman said that high courts might also consider the suggestions of senior advocate Sidharth Luthra, assisting the court as an amicus curiae in the matter, regarding the issue concerning identity of victims of sexual offences and protected witnesses.

Luthra told the bench that privacy of such victims and witnesses have to be protected and the Centre should come out with norms in this regard.

"This may be considered by the high courts," the bench said.

The Centre sought time from the court to come out with a report about the status of installation of CCTV cameras in various tribunals in the country.

The bench has posted the matter for further hearing in the last week of July.

The apex court had earlier cited the ghastly 26/11 Mumbai attack and the 2016 Patiala House court violence in Delhi to count on the benefits of installations of CCTV cameras in courts and tribunals, and had observed that it wanted to bring discipline, security and oversight in the judicial proceedings.

It had referred to the CCTV grab of 26/11 Mumbai attack case convict Ajmal Kasab at Victoria Terminus railway station and said it had proved detrimental for him during the trial in the matter.

It had also lauded the Centre for the "good work" done in installation of CCTV cameras in several tribunals, including the National Green Tribunal, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and National Company Law Tribunal.

The apex court had earlier said that it would first see the response of pilot project of CCTV installations in trial courts and tribunals and would then look for the possibility in the high courts and the Supreme Court.

The court is hearing a plea filed by a man seeking audio and video recordings of court proceedings in order to bring transparency.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 05 2018 | 10:15 PM IST

Next Story