Centre must give specifics of reference on SYL: Punjab to SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 01 2016 | 7:32 PM IST
Punjab government today asked the Centre in the Supreme Court to come out with details of the presidential reference over the Satluj-Yamuna Link (SYL) Canal issue, including why it was made.
"This reference is of fundamental importance. It is important for Union of India to explain why reference has been made by it. We want to know what we have to answer," senior advocate Rajeev Dhawan told a five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice A R Dave.
Appearing for Punjab government, Dhawan told the bench, conducting a hearing on the Presidential Reference pertaining to Punjab Termination of Agreements Act, 2004, that "this case has come from Centre and not from Haryana. We would like to see the views of Union."
With regard to Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Delhi, the question of quantum of water also arise and it has to be seen whether it is violative of Article 262 (adjudication of disputes relating to waters of inter State rivers or river valleys) of the Constitution, he said.
At the outset, senior advocate Ram Jethmalani, also on behalf of Punjab, said the bench should consider preliminary objections raised and the hearing on Haryana's applications on which interim order has been passed.
He said the interim order passed by the apex court has been complied with by Punjab.
The bench, which also comprised Justices P C Ghose, Shiva Kirti Singh, A K Goel and Amitava Roy, agreed with Jethmalani and said he could share with the parties the note on the preliminary objections.
On March 14, the Centre had said in the hearing on the
Presidential Reference that "the Centre will not take any side".
On the same day, Punjab Assembly had passed the bill against construction of the contentious SYL canal providing for transfer of proprietary rights back to the land owners free of cost.
Three days later, the apex court had directed maintenance of status quo on land meant for SYL canal, after Haryana alleged that attempts have been made to alter its use by levelling it.
The apex court in its interim order had also appointed Union Home Secretary and Punjab's Chief Secretary and Director General of Police as the 'joint receiver' of land and other property meant for the SYL canal till further order.
The legislation -- Punjab Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal (Rehabilitation and Re-vesting of Proprietary Rights) Bill, paves the way for denotifying 5,300 acres of land acquired in the Punjab side for 122 km SYL canal, of which 92 km falls in Haryana.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 01 2016 | 7:32 PM IST

Next Story