According to a proposed plan by the Ministry of Urban Development, public investment in infrastructure projects like metro line, elevated road or Railway project push up the property prices in a particular area.
On the other hand, the state government and urban local bodies reportedly face shortage of funds, leading to sluggish infrastructure development. To tide over this financial problem, the Ministry has formulated a fund raising scheme -- Value Capturing Finance (VCF) to capture a part of the increment in value of property due to public investment in infrastructure projects, it said.
Vacant land, commercial and residential properties would attract various charges like betterment levy, development charges, land value tax and fee for changing land use, he said.
Gauba said the mechanism could also be used by other Central ministries investing heavily in building national highways, railway projects, power generation and port infrastructure development.
Endorsing the scheme, the Finance Ministry has also issued an office memorandum stating, "The government has decided that VCF will be an integral part of detailed project report (DPR) of all projects of the Central government."
India requires about Rs 3,25,000 crore of urban infrastructure investment annually, according to a McKinsey report.
A high-powered expert committee, set up by the Urban Development Ministry, in its report in 2011 had projected urban infrastructure requirement at 0.75 per cent, which will increase to 1.5 per cent of the GDP by 2032.
In other terms, the investment requirement in urban infrastructure will increase from Rs 97,500 crore in 2011 to Rs 1,95,000 crore in 2032.
In 2011, the annual urban investments were about Rs 32,500 crore, leading to an investment gap of nearly Rs 65,000 crore.
"It would be better to pay for improved infrastructure than remain indifferent. We need to take some responsibility for infra development and the amount we pay would lead to further growth," a resident of Indirapuram in Ghaziabad district of Uttar Pradesh said.
Another resident of the area said, "We already pay so many taxes to the government apart from the income tax. It is the government's responsibility to provide facilities to the people. The burden of the same should not fall on us," he said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
