Certain humane considerations must influence grant of visa, HC tells Centre

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 12 2019 | 4:35 PM IST

Although the State has "unfettered discretion" while granting visas to foreign nationals, certain humane considerations must influence its decisions, the Delhi High Court has said.

The high court's observation came while directing the Centre to issue a visa to a woman from Uzbekistan who was being denied entry into India even though one of her minor children was granted a medical visa for treatment here.

Justice Vibhu Bakhru said that issuing a medical visa to the child while blacklisting the parent was "futile and serves no purpose".

"The courts, in several decisions, have emphasised upon the importance of having a humanitarian approach.

"Although the state has an unfettered discretion in the matter of granting visas to foreign citizens, certain humane considerations must influence its decisions," the court said in its order.

The relief has been granted to the woman subject to her giving an undertaking that she would leave the country on expiry of her visa along with her children.

She was blacklisted for staying back in India after expiry of her tourist visa as she had married someone here.

The court's order came on her husband's plea seeking removal of her name from the blacklist.

She had earlier arrived in India in November 2017 on a tourist visa which was valid till January 2018. During her stay here, she got married in December 2017.

Thereafter, she continued to stay here and left after obtaining an exit visa, her husband's petition said, adding that she had two kids from her first marriage which ended in a divorce.

Her 11-year-old daughter was issued a medical visa for two months for availing treatment at Fortis Hospital here and her 9-year-old son was granted a tourist visa, but she was denied the travel document, the petition said.

During the proceedings before the court, the Foreigner Regional Registration Office (FRRO) had declined to review her status till September 9, 2019 when her name would be removed from the blacklist in the normal course.

However, the court was of the view that the instant case "presents certain mitigating circumstances" and a humanitarian approach was required.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 12 2019 | 4:35 PM IST

Next Story