Chances for return of embryos brighten for 2 foreign couples

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Feb 20 2017 | 9:02 PM IST
Chances brightened for two US-based couples seeking return of their frozen embryos lying in a city hospital with the government saying their plea may be considered if they get a nod from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).
The hospital had refused to return them their embryos citing Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016 which bans surrogacy for foreign couples in India.
Being aggrieved, the two couples had moved the Bombay High Court which had asked the Centre in 2016 to decide on their plea.
The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) under the Union Commerce Ministry has now written a letter to the couples that they would have to obtain a no objection certificate from ICMR in case they wanted back their embryos.
"We have received such a letter from DGFT and would act accordingly," said their lawyer Vikrant Sabane.
The high court had earlier directed the Centre to explain why there was delay in taking such a decision despite repeated representations from the couples. In view of the new surrogacy rules, the court had also suggested to the Centre to "make an exception" on humanitarian grounds and take a reasonable and swift decision.
The court was hearing a plea filed by two San Francisco couples who came to India in 2015 looking for a surrogate, after they failed to conceive a child biologically.
The couples had brought eight frozen embryos, found surrogates and entered into a written contract with them, according to the rules in place at the time.
Before the embryos could be 'implanted' into the surrogates' wombs through IVF, the surrogacy rules in India changed with the introduction of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016.
The rule now allows only 'altruistic' surrogacy for childless Indian couples who have been married for at least five years. It also mandates that the surrogate mother be a "close relative" of the couple. Also, there is also a ban on import and export of frozen embryos, says their petition in the Bombay High Court.
The matter is expected to come up for hearing in due course.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 20 2017 | 9:02 PM IST

Next Story