CIC unable to punish CBI officials for delayed RTI response

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 19 2013 | 7:05 PM IST
In a peculiar case, the Central Information Commission could not punish some CBI officials for a delayed response on an RTI application seeking information on Commonwealth Games related corruption cases as the persons concerned were "no longer in service".
During a hearing of a complaint filed by Delhi advocate Vivek Garg, Chief Information Commissioner Satyananda Mishra said no penalty was imposed on the officials with CBI's Anti Corruption Branch (ACB), who were responsible for the delay in dealing with the RTI plea, as they were no longer in service.
The CBI had submitted that the delay was caused as the ACB received the the�RTI�application and a complaint on the matter at around same time. In�their�attempt to deal with both the complaint and the RTI application together the delay was caused, it said.
"This is hardly a very convincing application. There was no need to club the complaint and the RTI application even if the subject matter of the both was similar. The RTI application needed to be disposed of within a fixed time period," the panel said in the order.
Garg had sought to know details of action taken report on his complaints filed against Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit and other functionaries alleging their involvement in corruption in executing CWG related projects in the national capital.
The�respondent from the CBI also submitted the then Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) in charge of the ACB had died in the meanwhile, while the other officials dealing with the subject had either retired or left the job on resignations.
"Thus, all concerned who�were responsible for the delay in the ACB are no longer there in service. In these circumstances, we have no option but to close the case without imposing any penalty on anyone," Chief Information Commissioner Satyananda Mishra said in the order issued on March 7.
But, there is one lesson for the present CPIO, he must not mix up the RTI application with anything else even if the subject matter is the same and act on the RTI application strictly according to the provisions�of�the transparency law, Mishra said in the order.
Garg had filed the RTI application on December 11, 2011. Aggrieved over the delayed response, he had approached the CIC last year.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 19 2013 | 7:05 PM IST

Next Story