CIL decision to cancel coal won by JPL comes under HC lens

A bench of justices observed 'this was not how the govt should function'

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 25 2015 | 8:12 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today asked Coal India Ltd (CIL) how it was offering coal from two Chhattisgarh mines to NTPC when it had cited production issues to cancel an e-auction of 49,000 metric tonnes (MT) of the mineral, mined from the same area, which was won by JPL.

A bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva observed "this was not how the government should function" and asked CIL to come with instructions on the issue tomorrow.

Jindal Power Ltd (JPL), in an affidavit, has contended that while the 49,000 MT of non-coking coal won by it was cancelled citing production issues at Gare Palma IV/2 and IV/3 mines, 2.5 lakh tonne per month of coal from same area was being offered to National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd (NTPC) on 'as is where is basis'.
ALSO READ: Coal India draws logistics strategy to push coal evacuation

JPL said that much coal was being offered to NTPC for the PSU's thermal power plant at Barh in Patna, Bihar and to transport this the state-run enterprise had invited bids.

The company contended that it had participated in the e-auction held on April 11 and had bid the highest price of Rs 1008 per tonne of coal and had paid Rs 7.8 crore for the 49,000 MT coal won by it.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for JPL, said that on May 22 it was informed by CIL that the e-auction was being cancelled owing to production issues and the amount of Rs 7.8 crore was refunded.

He said CIL had on April 3 invited bids for 4.05 lakh tonne of non-coking coal and 1.5 lakh tonne of coking coal.

Of the 4.05 lakh tonne of non-coking coal, 60,000 metric tonne was to be auctioned from the two Gare Palma mines, JPL has said in the affidavit filed by it.

The affidavit was filed in the company's plea for quashing of March 20 order of the government cancelling the bids of the company and Bharat Aluminium Company (Balco) for four coal blocks amid speculation of cartelisation. Balco too has challenged the order separately.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 25 2015 | 7:22 PM IST

Next Story