The Cellular Operators' Association of India (COAI) also sought public apology from Jio for its recent remarks, and said its allegations against the industry body's Director General were "uncalled for and in bad taste".
COAI said it reserves the right to initiate legal action against Reliance Jio for alleged "false and malicious imputations" against the association and its officers.
"You are advised to withdraw your captioned notice and issue a public apology to us for your notice on behalf of RJIL (Reliance Jio Infocomm). You and RJIL are also advised to abstain from threatening us with legal action without cause or basis as you have done...," COAI said in the five page letter to the Reliance Jio.
In its letter to Reliance Jio, COAI Director General Rajan Mathews said that as an industry body, the association was "well within its rights" to voice its views or concerns over regulatory decisions that were "detrimental to the growth and development of the telecom sector".
COAI further argued that mere voicing of its views "does not form and cannot form a case of defamation" as alleged by Jio in its recent legal notice.
COAI also charged Jio of side-lining genuine issues sought to be raised by the association in its press release, and "attacking, belittling and making false imputations" against it.
It also accused Jio of attempting to malign the reputation of COAI every time the association took a stand which the company did not agree with.
COAI, last month, had also alleged that the orders appeared "to be strengthening the ambitions of one particular operator with deep pockets and monopolistic designs at the expense of other operators", although it did not name Reliance Jio which has hit the incumbent operators hard by its aggressive pricing of mobile services, especially data tariffs.
Reliance Jio had hit back terming COAI's allegations as "defamatory" and "malicious" and had also demanded that both the association and Mathews tender public apology on the issue.
Defending its concerns on the definition of significant market power in Trai's predatory pricing rules, COAI claimed that no benefit accrues to consumer on account of the revised definition.
COAI said that all its members, with sole exception to RJIL, were on board on the association's public stance on the issue, dated February 20.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
