Coal scam: Former top bureaucrat drags Manmohan Singh's name

Former Coal Secretary H C Gupta said Singh had the final authority to take decisions

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 28 2015 | 2:28 AM IST
A former top bureaucrat in the United Progressive Alliance government on Wednesday named former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in a coal scam by telling a special court that the latter took the “ultimate decision” as the then coal minister in allocation of the blocks.

Former coal secretary H C Gupta, an accused in the case pertaining to alleged irregularities in allocation of the Rajhara North coal block in Jharkhand to Kolkata-based Vini Iron and Steel Udyog (VISUL), said Singh had the "final authority" to take decisions.

Gupta’s claim came a week after a similar statement by former minister Dasari Narayan Rao, who had also alleged that the decision on final allocation "was taken by the Minister of Coal who was the then Prime Minister".

Rao is an accused in another case relating to the allocation of coal block to Congress leader Naveen Jindal' group firms.

ALSO READ: Coal scam: Bail for Naveen Jindal, 9 others

During the arguments on framing of charges today, Gupta's counsel argued that he was chairman of screening committee and was empowered to only recommend allocation of blocks whereas the minister-in-charge of the Coal Ministry was the "final authority" who took the decision.

"The ultimate power to allocate coal block was with the then Prime Minister of India (Singh), who was also the Coal Minister at that time," Gupta's counsel told Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar.

The counsel said that being the chairman of the screening committee, Gupta had sent the recommendation to the then "Coal Minister who after exercising all his wisdom and discretion, decided to allocate coal block to somebody (applicant firm)."

"Secretary of Coal Ministry does not have dominion over coal. Union of India was having part dominion (over it). The Coal Minister was having the dominion over the coal blocks," the counsel said.

He said secretary of a ministry was only an advisor of the minister-in-charge and the final decision was of the minister.

"Gupta cannot take decision on its own. Only the Minister of Coal was competent to take the final decision," he said.

During the hearing, lawyers for some of the co-accused also advanced their arguments on framing of charges. The court has now fixed the case for May 29 when CBI's prosecutor will rebut the arguments of the accused.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 28 2015 | 12:28 AM IST

Next Story