Delhi HC allows Greenpeace to use two accounts to get domestic donations

The court also allowed the NGO to liquidate its fixed deposits, saying these and fresh donations be used for its aims and objectives

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-133683230/stock-photo-scales-of-justice-gavel-and-books.html" target="_blank">Gavel</a> image via Shutterstock
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 27 2015 | 3:31 PM IST
In a relief for Greenpeace India, Delhi High Court today allowed it to use two of its accounts for the purpose of receiving and utilising fresh domestic donations for its day-to-day functioning, telling the government it cannot choke them of their funds.

Justice Rajiv Shakdher also allowed the NGO to liquidate its fixed deposits, saying these and fresh donations be used for its aims and objectives and in accordance with law.

ALSO READ: Centre defends cancellation of FCRA registration of Greenpeace

The court said the source of the fixed deposits could be determined by the government in the course of its probe and directed it to decide within eight weeks the NGO's application under Rule 14 of Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Rules (FCRR) which says that 25% of the unutilised amount in the FCRA account can be used with government approval.

The government had cancelled Greenpeace's registration under Foreign Contribution Regulations Act (FCRA) on grounds of allegedly violating the norms by opening five accounts to use foreign donations without informing concerned authorities.

ALSO READ: It was a humiliating year: Greenpeace

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) also told the court that the NGO had violated FCRA by merging its foreign donations with domestic contributions.

The court also pulled up the banks with whom Greenpeace had domestic accounts for denying access to it despite an earlier high court order allowing them to use the accounts.


It asked the banks to explain why its order of January this year was violated. "Do you go by orders of the court or that of the government," it asked and added "you have to follow court's judgement."

Yesterday, the MHA had defended the cancellation of FCRA registration of Greenpeace and said the NGO has already applied for seeking benefits under Rule 14 which has not been disclosed to the court. It had also claimed that the NGO was not using the donations for the purpose they were received.

Greenpeace had told the court that due to freeze on its domestic accounts, it has lost donations to the extent of Rs 1.25 crore only this month which were made by its Indian contributors.

It had also claimed that if the court does not intervene, then it would lose the same amount of domestic donations in June as well.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 27 2015 | 3:13 PM IST

Next Story