"I am of the considered opinion that on account of failure of competent sanctioning authority to take any decision on the request of CBI for considering according of sanction to prosecute public servants under section 19 Prevention of Corruption Act viz either to grant or to refuse, the necessary corollary which emerges out is that sanction should be deemed to have been granted by the competent authority," Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar said.
In its order, the court held that "a period of almost six months has elapsed since the request for considering according of sanction was sent by CBI."
It referred to a judgement of the Supreme Court that the competent authority should take a decision on the issue of sanction within four months from the day the request had been forwarded to it by the probe agency.
The two seperate cases pertain to alleged irregularities in allocation of coal blocks to JLD Yavatmal Energy Ltd and JAS Infrastructure and Power Ltd, now known as JAS Infrastructure Capital Pvt Ltd.
During the hearing in these two cases today, senior public prosecutor V K Sharma told the court that the process of obtaining sanction to prosecute Kropha and Samria was still on.
The court has fixed July 31 for passing orders on taking cognizance in these two cases.
